Maps, Sketches, Charts, and Diagrams
Annecharico v. Patterson, 688 A.2d 1341, 44 Conn.App. 271 (Conn.App. 1997)
“Because the witness was qualified to render an opinion on the point of impact and the opinion was based on his own observations of the accident scene, it was proper for the trial court to admit Mantho's testimony and the diagram [of the accident ...
Marsh v. Washburn, 528 A.2d 382, 11 Conn.App. 447 (Conn.App. 1987)
“The trial court acted properly in admitting the diagram, not as an ‘accident reconstruction diagram,’ but as a field diagram drawn by the officer at the scene depicting his visual observations of the scene along with his inference as to the ...
State v. Thomas, 554 A.2d 1048, 210 Conn. 199 (Conn. 1989)
A diagram of the convenience store was introduced into evidence at trial.
DeMarkey v. Fratturo, 836 A.2d 1257, 80 Conn.App. 650 (Conn.App. 2003)
The jury was presented with two other diagrams depicting Mann's impressions of the plaintiff's path Before he was struck by the defendant's vehicle. Each of the three diagrams was admitted without objection and indicated that the plaintiff had run ...
Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool, 694 A.2d 1319 (1997)
Map was no more than a pictorial representation. Marsh v. Washburn, 528 A.2d 382 (1987) Diagram was an illustration not a reconstruction.
Heath v. Commissioner of Transportation, 398 A.2d 1192 (1978)
Prejudicial effect of sketch outweighed its probative value.
Schenck v. Pelkey, 405 A.2d 665 (1978)
Posted warnings admissible for limited purpose.
Aczas v. Stuart Heights, 221 A.2d 559 (1966)
Map was no more than a pictorial representation.
Fasanelli v. Terzo, 189 A.2d 349 (1963)
Diagram was illustrative of witness' testimony.
Capone v. Sloan, 182 Conn.. 414 (1962)
Sketch was illustrative of officers' testimony.
Johnson v. Toscano, 136 A.2d 341 (1957)
Medical chart properly excluded.
Gillette v. Shroeder, 54 A.2d 498 (1947)
A medical chart was inadmissible; standard is if it will assist the jury and is not cumulative of other evidence.
Dawson v. Davis, 8 A.2d 703 (1939)
A sketch was admissible to enable the court to visualize the general situation.
Hall v. Sera, 152 A.2d 148 (1830)
Do not need an accurate map of locality; a sketch diagram drawn by a witness on the witness stand is admissible.