State v. Carter, 744 A.2d 839 (R.I. 2000)
The judge admitted challenged photographs because he believed they did not so "inflame" the jury that it was unable to weigh the evidence and to reach a verdict in a rational and thoughtful manner.
Related Articles
T.H. Leland v. D.R. Leonard, 112 A. 198, 95 Vt. 36 (Vt. 1921)
The value of photographs and photographic enlargements of questioned signatures and documents is everywhere recognized. [95 Vt. 38] It is attested by this Court in Rowell v. Fuller's Estate, 59 Vt. 688, 10 A. 853. They must be properly verified, to ...
State v. Pulphus, 465 A.2d 153 (R.I. 1983)
This court has always allowed the admission of X-ray photographs into evidence even though no one can testify from direct observation inside the body that they accurately represent what they purport to show. Williams v. Altruda, 74 R.I. 47, 58 A.2d ...
State v. Pulphus, 465 A.2d 153 (R.I. 1983)
A photograph may be admissible as substantive evidence rather than solely as illustrative evidence to support a witness's testimony, provided that sufficient foundation testimony is given to show the circumstances under which the photograph was taken ...
State v. Jensen, 40 A.3d 771 (R.I. 2012)
The state then introduced a photograph of bubble gum, which photograph was later marked as a full exhibit
State v. Grullon, 984 A.2d 46 (R.I. 2009)
The trial justice admitted the photocopy of a $100 bill instead of providing the original because he accepted the state's representation that the original was unavailable for purposes of Rule 1004 of the Rhode Island Rules of Evidence, because the ...