Sanderson v. Steve Snyder Enterprises, Inc., 196 Conn. 134, 143, 491 A.2d 389 (1985)

• Related Articles

• Sanderson v. Steve Snyder Enterprises, Inc., 196 Conn. 134, 143, 491 A.2d 389 (1985)

  The general rule is that evidence of subsequent repair is not admissible on the issue of negligence.

• Annecharico v. Patterson, 688 A.2d 1341, 44 Conn.App. 271 (Conn.App. 1997)

  “Because the witness was qualified to render an opinion on the point of impact and the opinion was based on his own observations of the accident scene, it was proper for the trial court to admit Mantho's testimony and the diagram [of the accident ...

• T.H. Leland v. D.R. Leonard, 112 A. 198, 95 Vt. 36 (Vt. 1921)

  The value of photographs and photographic enlargements of questioned signatures and documents is everywhere recognized. [95 Vt. 38] It is attested by this Court in Rowell v. Fuller's Estate, 59 Vt. 688, 10 A. 853. They must be properly verified, to ...

• Central Cab, Inc. v. Ironside, 230 A.2d 790, 126 Vt. 356 (Vt. 1967)

  While the photographs, to which the lower court refers in the finding, were not in the strict sense of the term 'physical evidence', as the lower court seems to imply, they were demonstrative evidence of the damage caused to the car of the defendant ...

• Killary v. Bulington-Lake Champlain Chamber of Commerce, Inc., 186 A.2d 170, 123 Vt. 256 (Vt. 1962)

  The test of admissibility of colored photographs is the same as it is for models, maps, plans and black and white photographs. Preliminary evidence is required to show that they are sufficiently accurate to be helpful to the jury, and this is a ...