Pritchard v. State, 810 N.E.2d 758, 760 (Ind.Ct.App.2004)

• Related Articles

• Commonwealth v. Place, 961 N.E.2d 597, 81 Mass.App.Ct. 229 (2012)

  “At trial, the prosecution introduced a photograph of Tina from the time when the rape occurred. This was not error, as demonstrative evidence of Tina's relative size and immaturity, such as the photograph at issue, was relevant to the element of ...

• Welch v. Keene Corp., 575 N.E.2d 766, 31 Mass.App.Ct. 157 (1991)

  Summary charts of voluminous evidence are permissible if they are accurate and fair, although "care must be taken to insure that summaries accurately [31 Mass.App.Ct. 166] reflect the contents of the underlying documents and do not function ...

• Commonwealth v. DiFonzo, 576 N.E.2d 1382, 31 Mass.App.Ct. 921 (1991)

  “As far as any chalk diagrams that may be used (during retrial) are concerned, the general rule is that evidence must be admitted as an exhibit in order to be considered by the jury. A judge, however, has ‘considerable, but not unrestrained, ...

• Commonwealth v. Cocroft, 956 N.E.2d 264, 80 Mass.App.Ct. 1112 (2011)

  “The defendant challenges a remark included in the prosecutor's closing argument which indicated that the prosecutor had seen a clearer version of the gas station surveillance video than the jury had seen at trial. There was no objection. ...

• Commonwealth v. Cocroft, 956 N.E.2d 264, 80 Mass.App.Ct. 1112 (2011)

  “The defendant challenges a remark included in the prosecutor's closing argument which indicated that the prosecutor had seen a clearer version of the gas station surveillance video than the jury had seen at trial. There was no objection. ...