People v. McHugh, 476 NYS.2d 721, 722 (Sup.Ct. 1984)

People v. McHugh, 476 NYS.2d 721, 722 (Sup.Ct. 1984)

A computer is not a gimmick and the court should not be shy about its use, when proper. Computers are simply mechanical tools – receiving information and acting on instructions at lightning speed. When the results are useful, they should be accepted, when confusing, they should be rejected. What is important is that the presentation be relevant . . . that it fairly and accurately reflect the oral testimony offered and that it be an aid to the jury’s understanding of the issues in the case.

    • Related Articles

    • Kelly v. Kelly, 50 Mass.App.Ct. 1101 (2000)

       Generally, a party may not present an argument on appeal that has not been presented in the trial court. White v. White,  40 Mass.App.Ct. 132, 133 (1996); Liacos, Massachusetts Evidence §3.8.1 (7th ed. 1999) ("Failure  to object to offered evidence ...

    • Commonwealth v. Yuri Y., 957 N.E.2d 1132, 81 Mass.App.Ct. 1102 (2011)

      “The authenticity of a photograph is a preliminary question of fact for resolution by the trial judge, Commonwealth v.. Figueroa, 56 Mass.App.Ct. 641, 646 (2002), and, the judge's preliminary determination concerning authenticity is conclusive unless ...

    • T.H. Leland v. D.R. Leonard, 112 A. 198, 95 Vt. 36 (Vt. 1921)

      The value of photographs and photographic enlargements of questioned signatures and documents is everywhere recognized. [95 Vt. 38] It is attested by this Court in Rowell v. Fuller's Estate, 59 Vt. 688, 10 A. 853. They must be properly verified, to ...

    • Commonwealth v. Carey, 26 Mass. App. Ct. 339 (1988)

      "Videotapes are 'on balance, a reliable evidentiary resource.' Commonwealth v. Harvey, 397 Mass. 351 (1986).' When relevant, videotapes have the virtue of presenting an accurate, vivid, and fair representation of the way people acted or spoke or how ...

    • White v. White, 40 Mass.App.Ct. 132 (1996)

      Failure to Object The father did not object to the judge permitting the witness to testify in private. [ 2]  "Ordinarily, a party is not entitled to present an argument on appeal on an issue not presented in the court below." Atlas Tack Corp. v. ...