Lucier v. Meriden-Walingford Sand & Stone, 216 A.2d 818 (1966)

• Related Articles

• Lucier v. Meriden-Walingford Sand & Stone, 216 A.2d 818 (1966)

  One of three photographs of deceased in coffin was admissible because probative of scar on neck

• T.H. Leland v. D.R. Leonard, 112 A. 198, 95 Vt. 36 (Vt. 1921)

  The value of photographs and photographic enlargements of questioned signatures and documents is everywhere recognized. [95 Vt. 38] It is attested by this Court in Rowell v. Fuller's Estate, 59 Vt. 688, 10 A. 853. They must be properly verified, to ...

• State v. Hardy, 489 A.2d 508 (Me. 1985)

  The results of experiments are admissible if they are conducted under circumstances which bear a "substantial similarity" to those surrounding the event placed in issue at trial. See Sucrest Corporation v. M/V Jennifer, 455 F.Supp. 371, 385 n. 22 ...

• Berney v. Dinsmore, 141 Mass. 42 (1886)

  Plaintiff should be allowed to pick out a similar stone. The plaintiff, though not an expert as to the value of pearls, should be allowed to select stones corresponding in size, shape, and color to the one lost, to be shown to the jury.

• Commonwealth v. Harvey, 397 Mass. 351, 359 (1986)

  When, as here, the demonstrative photograph is generated as a digital image or video image, the judge must determine whether the image fairly and accurately presents what it purports to be, whether it is relevant, and whether its probative value ...