Heath v. Commissioner of Transportation, 398 A.2d 1192 (1978)
Prejudicial effect of sketch outweighed its probative value.
Related Articles
Hamilton v. Inhabitants of Heath, 246 Mass. 335 (1923)
“So far as the photographs showed the precise place of the accident, they were admissible in the discretion of the court. Everson v. Casualty Co. of America, 208 Mass. 214 , 219-221.”
T.H. Leland v. D.R. Leonard, 112 A. 198, 95 Vt. 36 (Vt. 1921)
The value of photographs and photographic enlargements of questioned signatures and documents is everywhere recognized. [95 Vt. 38] It is attested by this Court in Rowell v. Fuller's Estate, 59 Vt. 688, 10 A. 853. They must be properly verified, to ...
Kelly v. Kelly, 50 Mass.App.Ct. 1101 (2000)
Generally, a party may not present an argument on appeal that has not been presented in the trial court. White v. White, 40 Mass.App.Ct. 132, 133 (1996); Liacos, Massachusetts Evidence §3.8.1 (7th ed. 1999) ("Failure to object to offered evidence ...
State v. Hardy, 489 A.2d 508 (Me. 1985)
The results of experiments are admissible if they are conducted under circumstances which bear a "substantial similarity" to those surrounding the event placed in issue at trial. See Sucrest Corporation v. M/V Jennifer, 455 F.Supp. 371, 385 n. 22 ...
White v. White, 40 Mass.App.Ct. 132 (1996)
Failure to Object The father did not object to the judge permitting the witness to testify in private. [ 2] "Ordinarily, a party is not entitled to present an argument on appeal on an issue not presented in the court below." Atlas Tack Corp. v. ...