Gioielli v. Mallard Cove Condominium, 658 A.2d 134 (1995)
Inadmissible because no evidence as to when photograph was taken or its relevance. Booker v. Stern, 563 A.2d 305 (1989). The time a photograph was taken goes to the weight to be given it, not its admissibility. State v. Smith, 540 A.2d 679 (1988).
Related Articles
Gioielli v. Mallard Cove Condominium, 658 A.2d 134 (1995)
Inadmissible because no evidence as to when photograph was taken or its relevance. Booker v. Stern, 563 A.2d 305 (1989). The time a photograph was taken goes to the weight to be given it, not its admissibility. State v. Smith, 540 A.2d 679 (1988).
T.H. Leland v. D.R. Leonard, 112 A. 198, 95 Vt. 36 (Vt. 1921)
The value of photographs and photographic enlargements of questioned signatures and documents is everywhere recognized. [95 Vt. 38] It is attested by this Court in Rowell v. Fuller's Estate, 59 Vt. 688, 10 A. 853. They must be properly verified, to ...
State v. Hardy, 489 A.2d 508 (Me. 1985)
The results of experiments are admissible if they are conducted under circumstances which bear a "substantial similarity" to those surrounding the event placed in issue at trial. See Sucrest Corporation v. M/V Jennifer, 455 F.Supp. 371, 385 n. 22 ...
Commonwealth v. Harvey, 397 Mass. 351, 359 (1986)
When, as here, the demonstrative photograph is generated as a digital image or video image, the judge must determine whether the image fairly and accurately presents what it purports to be, whether it is relevant, and whether its probative value ...
State v. Irving, 818 A.2d 204, 2003 ME 31 (Me. 2003)
An illustrative aid is a depiction or object which illustrates testimony or argument. M.R. Evid. 616(a). It does not go into the jury room unless counsel agree or by order of the court for good cause. Id. 616(d). While it does not have to meet the ...