Farrell v. Matchett, 37 N.E.2d 247, 310 Mass. 87 (1941)

• Related Articles

• Commonwealth v. Greenberg, 160 N.E.2d 181, 339 Mass. 557 (1959)

  As to several witnesses called by the Commonwealth the district attorney sought to refresh their recollection by showing them written statements purporting to have been made by them. There was no error in the denial of requests by the defendants that ...

• Commonwealth v. Carnes, 933 N.E.2d 598, 457 Mass. 812 (2010)

  Summaries of testimony are admissible, provided that the underlying records have been admitted in evidence and that the summaries accurately reflect the records. See Commonwealth v. Guy, 454 Mass. 440, 446 n. 5, 910 N.E.2d 358 (2009);  Welch v. Keene ...

• Peloquin v. Robert Northridge Furniture Co., 178 N.E.2d 495, 343 Mass. 317 (1961)

  “A medical witness of the plaintiff in testifying to the plaintiff's injuries was permitted to use a 'Chart of Osteology' as a chalk and exhibited on the blackboard after a conference at the bench. Everson v. Casualty Co. of America, 208 Mass. 214, ...

• Commonwealth v. Place, 961 N.E.2d 597, 81 Mass.App.Ct. 229 (2012)

  “At trial, the prosecution introduced a photograph of Tina from the time when the rape occurred. This was not error, as demonstrative evidence of Tina's relative size and immaturity, such as the photograph at issue, was relevant to the element of ...

• Commonwealth v. DiFonzo, 576 N.E.2d 1382, 31 Mass.App.Ct. 921 (1991)

  “As far as any chalk diagrams that may be used (during retrial) are concerned, the general rule is that evidence must be admitted as an exhibit in order to be considered by the jury. A judge, however, has ‘considerable, but not unrestrained, ...