Dawson v. Davis, 8 A.2d 703 (1939)
A sketch was admissible to enable the court to visualize the general situation.
Related Articles
T.H. Leland v. D.R. Leonard, 112 A. 198, 95 Vt. 36 (Vt. 1921)
The value of photographs and photographic enlargements of questioned signatures and documents is everywhere recognized. [95 Vt. 38] It is attested by this Court in Rowell v. Fuller's Estate, 59 Vt. 688, 10 A. 853. They must be properly verified, to ...
Hester A. Davis v. S. Farrar Dunn, 98 A. 81, 90 Vt. 253 (V. 1916)
But the rules governing the examination of other witnesses did not give the right to examine respecting the contents of the X-ray photograph, until the photograph had been properly verified or authenticated by some evidence other than itself. 10 R. ...
Accetta v. Provencal, 962 A.2d 56 (R.I. 2009)
The trial justice allowed into evidence photographs of car accident in which the car was minimally damaged. This was allowed with an expert witness to explain that “substantial bodily injury nevertheless could result from a car accident with minimal ...
State v. Hardy, 489 A.2d 508 (Me. 1985)
The results of experiments are admissible if they are conducted under circumstances which bear a "substantial similarity" to those surrounding the event placed in issue at trial. See Sucrest Corporation v. M/V Jennifer, 455 F.Supp. 371, 385 n. 22 ...
Commonwealth v. Harvey, 397 Mass. 351, 359 (1986)
When, as here, the demonstrative photograph is generated as a digital image or video image, the judge must determine whether the image fairly and accurately presents what it purports to be, whether it is relevant, and whether its probative value ...