Curtis v. New York, N.H. & H.R. Co., 80 A. 127, 32 R.I. 542 (R.I. 1911)
The admission of photographs of places and things, for the purpose of aiding the jury in applying the facts proved to the particular case, is a matter of almost everyday occurrence in the courts.
Related Articles
Dederichs v. Salt Lake City R. Co., 14 Utah 137, 141, 46 P. 656, 657, 35 L.R.A. 802, 807
The court, by Miner, J., speaking of photographs excluded by the court below, said: "These photographs exhibited the surface condition of the streets, buildings, trees, cars, railroad track, poles, and distances, and would, no doubt, carry to the ...
Peloquin v. Robert Northridge Furniture Co., 178 N.E.2d 495, 343 Mass. 317 (1961)
“A medical witness of the plaintiff in testifying to the plaintiff's injuries was permitted to use a 'Chart of Osteology' as a chalk and exhibited on the blackboard after a conference at the bench. Everson v. Casualty Co. of America, 208 Mass. 214, ...
T.H. Leland v. D.R. Leonard, 112 A. 198, 95 Vt. 36 (Vt. 1921)
The value of photographs and photographic enlargements of questioned signatures and documents is everywhere recognized. [95 Vt. 38] It is attested by this Court in Rowell v. Fuller's Estate, 59 Vt. 688, 10 A. 853. They must be properly verified, to ...
State v. Pulphus, 465 A.2d 153 (R.I. 1983)
This court has always allowed the admission of X-ray photographs into evidence even though no one can testify from direct observation inside the body that they accurately represent what they purport to show. Williams v. Altruda, 74 R.I. 47, 58 A.2d ...
Coffey v. James H. McManus Shoppes of America, Inc., 631 A.2d 833 (R.I. 1993)
The admissibility of depositions using the freeze-frame technique within a videotaped deposition is a matter to be ruled on by the trial justice at the time of trial.