Commonwealth v. Pixley, 42 Mass. App. Ct. 927 (1997)
Actual binoculars allowed into jury deliberation room after admitted as evidence and marked as exhibit, notwithstanding possible experimentation by jury (citing similar cases around U.S.).
Related Articles
Commonwealth v. Mimless, 760 N.E.2d 762, 53 Mass.App.Ct. 534 (2002)
“A thirty-four page bar chart depicting the hours the defendant billed Medicaid each day was used as a chalk at trial. "A judge . . . has `considerable, but not unrestrained, discretion as to the degree to which chalks can be used.'" Commonwealth v. ...
Commonwealth v. Yuri Y., 957 N.E.2d 1132, 81 Mass.App.Ct. 1102 (2011)
“The authenticity of a photograph is a preliminary question of fact for resolution by the trial judge, Commonwealth v.. Figueroa, 56 Mass.App.Ct. 641, 646 (2002), and, the judge's preliminary determination concerning authenticity is conclusive unless ...
Commonwealth v. Place, 961 N.E.2d 597, 81 Mass.App.Ct. 229 (2012)
“At trial, the prosecution introduced a photograph of Tina from the time when the rape occurred. This was not error, as demonstrative evidence of Tina's relative size and immaturity, such as the photograph at issue, was relevant to the element of ...
Commonwealth v. Cocroft, 956 N.E.2d 264, 80 Mass.App.Ct. 1112 (2011)
“The defendant challenges a remark included in the prosecutor's closing argument which indicated that the prosecutor had seen a clearer version of the gas station surveillance video than the jury had seen at trial. There was no objection. ...
Commonwealth v. Cocroft, 956 N.E.2d 264, 80 Mass.App.Ct. 1112 (2011)
“The defendant challenges a remark included in the prosecutor's closing argument which indicated that the prosecutor had seen a clearer version of the gas station surveillance video than the jury had seen at trial. There was no objection. ...