Commonwealth v. Greenberg, 339 Mass. 557, 160 N.E.2d 181 (1959)
The Commonwealth called as a witness an accountant who had collated the checks and deposit slips of Greenberg and Maitland which had been admitted in evidence and had listed their dates and the amounts on large charts which were shown to the jury and later admitted in evidence.
Related Articles
Commonwealth v. Greenberg, 160 N.E.2d 181, 339 Mass. 557 (1959)
As to several witnesses called by the Commonwealth the district attorney sought to refresh their recollection by showing them written statements purporting to have been made by them. There was no error in the denial of requests by the defendants that ...
Commonwealth v. Guy, 910 N.E.2d 358, 454 Mass. 440, 446 (2009)
The judge ruled that: DNA " notebooks" provided to jurors during the testimony of a forensic DNA analyst from the Maine laboratory could be used by jurors during deliberations. A copy was marked " P" for identification. The defendant objected ...
Commonwealth v. Carnes, 933 N.E.2d 598, 457 Mass. 812 (2010)
Summaries of testimony are admissible, provided that the underlying records have been admitted in evidence and that the summaries accurately reflect the records. See Commonwealth v. Guy, 454 Mass. 440, 446 n. 5, 910 N.E.2d 358 (2009); Welch v. Keene ...
Commonwealth v. Place, 961 N.E.2d 597, 81 Mass.App.Ct. 229 (2012)
“At trial, the prosecution introduced a photograph of Tina from the time when the rape occurred. This was not error, as demonstrative evidence of Tina's relative size and immaturity, such as the photograph at issue, was relevant to the element of ...
Welch v. Keene Corp., 575 N.E.2d 766, 31 Mass.App.Ct. 157 (1991)
Summary charts of voluminous evidence are permissible if they are accurate and fair, although "care must be taken to insure that summaries accurately [31 Mass.App.Ct. 166] reflect the contents of the underlying documents and do not function ...