Commonwealth v. Cocroft, 956 N.E.2d 264, 80 Mass.App.Ct. 1112 (2011)

• Related Articles

• Commonwealth v. Cocroft, 956 N.E.2d 264, 80 Mass.App.Ct. 1112 (2011)

  “The defendant challenges a remark included in the prosecutor's closing argument which indicated that the prosecutor had seen a clearer version of the gas station surveillance video than the jury had seen at trial. There was no objection. ...

• Commonwealth v. Place, 961 N.E.2d 597, 81 Mass.App.Ct. 229 (2012)

  “At trial, the prosecution introduced a photograph of Tina from the time when the rape occurred. This was not error, as demonstrative evidence of Tina's relative size and immaturity, such as the photograph at issue, was relevant to the element of ...

• Commonwealth v. DiFonzo, 576 N.E.2d 1382, 31 Mass.App.Ct. 921 (1991)

  “As far as any chalk diagrams that may be used (during retrial) are concerned, the general rule is that evidence must be admitted as an exhibit in order to be considered by the jury. A judge, however, has ‘considerable, but not unrestrained, ...

• Commonwealth v. Boyden, 400 N.E.2d 1312, 9 Mass.App.Ct. 857 (1980)

  Chalk should not have been sent into deliberation room was harmless error. The defendant appeals from his convictions on charges of assault with intent to murder, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, and unlawful carrying of a firearm. He ...

• Commonwealth v. Mimless, 760 N.E.2d 762, 53 Mass.App.Ct. 534 (2002)

  “A thirty-four page bar chart depicting the hours the defendant billed Medicaid each day was used as a chalk at trial. "A judge . . . has `considerable, but not unrestrained, discretion as to the degree to which chalks can be used.'" Commonwealth v. ...