US v. Milkiewicz (1st Circuit), 12/6/2006, No. 06-1192
When a defendant affirmatively agrees to the [opposition's] proposed use of evidence, there has been a waiver and the defendant is not entitled even to plain error review of a claim that the evidence was inadmissible.
Related Articles
Commonwealth v. St. Pierre, 11-P-654 (MACA)
“The Commonwealth also introduced photographs depicting the damage. Without objection, Detective Bourget estimated the damage.”
Commonwealth v. St. Peter, 96-P-1629 (1996)
Autopsy photos admissible even if cumulative of other evidence or support facts stipulated; BUT if photos depict body as altered in the course of autopsy, admissible only if they would assist jury on a contested point.
Coleman Bros., Inc. v. Union St. Ry. Co., 198 N.E. 917, 292 Mass. 557 (1935)
A cut or picture of the compressor was admitted as a chalk to give idea of what it looked like.
State v. Mahlon J. Gravelle, 89 A.2d 111, 117 Vt. 238 (Vt. 1952)
Models, maps, plans and photographs belong, in the law of evidence, to the same class, and are admissible only when properly verified. That is to say, preliminary evidence is required to show that they are sufficiently accurate to be helpful to the ...
State v. Pulphus, 465 A.2d 153 (R.I. 1983)
A photograph may be admissible as substantive evidence rather than solely as illustrative evidence to support a witness's testimony, provided that sufficient foundation testimony is given to show the circumstances under which the photograph was taken ...